Commingling
The order says restricted and unrestricted funds were commingled in at least one account and that donor-advised funds were not routinely deposited into separately identified accounts.
Start with the 2023 national reporting, then the 2025 donor complaints, the 2026 Georgia TV investigation, and finally the state enforcement order. The sequence shows how the story changed over time.
Follow the story →Georgia's Secretary of State investigated SDG Impact Fund, Inc. and Anthony “Tony” Suber and issued an emergency cease-and-desist order in June 2026. The order describes alleged commingling, personal transactions, donor complaints, related entities, and a continuing trail of bank activity. This project organizes the public record—and separates government findings from the surrounding publicity network.
Rather than relying on internet accusations, this site anchors its reporting in the Secretary of State's own 25-page order and related public records.
The order says restricted and unrestricted funds were commingled in at least one account and that donor-advised funds were not routinely deposited into separately identified accounts.
Georgia says donor-advised fund money was allowed to move to for-profit entities, investments, employees and contractors in circumstances it characterized as non-charitable.
The order details payments it says involved a vehicle dealership, a Louisiana property, private-school tuition, credit cards, travel, retail and other personal expenses.
The order says donors were told the fund was concluding operations while bank transactions continued, and says SDGIF appeared to operate as SDG Global.
Page 1 identifies SDG Impact Fund, Inc. and Anthony Suber as respondents in Case ENCH-250581 and states that the Secretary caused an investigation to determine compliance with Georgia's Charitable Solicitations Act.
The order says donor funds were used in connection with a Louisiana property owned by Suber and reports payments to a private college-preparatory school attended by two of his children.
The Secretary ordered cease-and-desist relief, barred specified charitable activity, and imposed a $100,000 joint-and-several civil penalty.
These are examples drawn from Georgia's findings. The site should link each figure back to the underlying page so readers can distinguish what the regulator found from interpretation.
The surrounding public record included high-profile media coverage, United Nations-adjacent events, blockchain marketing, brand-name references, and “impact” language. Those associations matter because they help explain how credibility was constructed—but they should not be misread as evidence that every company, publication, event organizer or brand mentioned was involved in wrongdoing.
Editorial rule: Forbes, Red Bull and the Austrian National Tourist Office are presented here as part of the historical publicity context. Georgia's order does not accuse those organizations of misconduct in the SDG Impact Fund matter.
Forbes profiled Kelsey Cole as an Adbank cofounder and reported that Adbank raised about $14 million within 30 days during its ICO campaign.
A 2018 release said the Austrian National Tourist Office piloted Adbank technology and that Red Bull Media House supplied publisher inventory through Bergwelten.
Adbank's own blog said it sponsored the SDG Impact Fund and described Kelsey Cole's participation in a Frontier Finance event during UN General Assembly week.
The investigative question is how these names and events were used in the credibility narrative—not whether outside brands endorsed later conduct described by Georgia.
A Canadian securities distribution filing reviewed in this investigation lists three purchasers in the United States receiving approximately CAD $534,593.42 of securities, out of roughly CAD $1.27 million distributed to 15 purchasers. The filing's U.S. row identifies the exemption as “Other,” with the description that the distribution did not take place in Canada.
This does not establish that Adbank funds were transferred to SDG Impact Fund. We currently treat the Adbank material as a separate documentary thread involving overlapping people, promotion and later SDG Impact Fund publicity. Any direct money-flow connection should be published only if supported by records.
Our reporting should also distinguish the Canadian filing from promotional statements concerning U.S. participation in the ICO and present both documents side by side.
Georgia's order identifies Suber as Executive Director, Board Chairman and the self-reported sole board member of SDG Impact Fund. Corporate filings cited in the order also list him in multiple officer and registered-agent roles.
Georgia order respondentThe Chronicle of Philanthropy reported that Doreian, an officer of SDG Impact Fund and a developer in the PIVX ecosystem, was sentenced to one year in prison in December 2024 for tax evasion involving crypto gains. The Chronicle specifically reported that the charges did not directly relate to his SDG Impact Fund work.
Separate criminal caseForbes profiled Cole in connection with Adbank's ICO and described her role in its fundraising campaign. Archived Adbank material later tied her public profile to SDG-related events and SDG Impact Fund sponsorship.
Context — not Georgia respondentAssociated Press reporting identified Nystrom as one of the people who founded the organization that became SDG Impact Fund. Her role belongs in the historical formation timeline, separate from Georgia's later enforcement findings.
Historical leadershipAP identified Bell as a founder-director of the Museum of Crypto Art and one of the people associated with the fund's early crypto-oriented development.
Historical contextThe Chronicle's 2025 reporting identified Molinari among former board members who no longer appeared on the fund's then-current website and did not respond to its interview requests.
Former board contextThe Securities and Charities Division conducted the investigation underlying Case ENCH-250581. The June 2026 order contains the government's findings, legal conclusions and administrative sanctions.
Primary government sourceWSB-TV interviewed Meyer in its July 2026 report about the Georgia action. The site treats donor accounts as attributed testimony and keeps them distinct from regulator findings.
Media-source testimonyThe Adbank material belongs on the site as a separate documentary track because it captures the public-facing campaign that surrounded the ICO: the explainer video, Forbes coverage, team positioning, public marketing claims, and later securities-filing questions.
The uploaded investigation file itself records the ICO video URL, the Forbes profile, references to other Adbank videos, screenshots of the founding team, investor chats, and the later Canadian securities-filing issue. The site treats allegations in that investigation file as allegations unless independently verified.
Forbes profiled Kelsey Cole as an Adbank cofounder, discussed how the team built credibility for the ICO, noted that an SNL writer worked on the explainer video, and reported that Adbank raised about $14 million in 30 days.
Read Forbes ↗The uploaded investigation file cites a September 2018 Forbes story about Adbank's viral video and the Austrian National Tourism Office. The original Forbes URL was not preserved in the file, so this card flags it for archival recovery rather than inventing a link.
Search archival result ↗An archived Adbank Medium post tied Cole's public profile to SDG-related events and described Adbank as a sponsor of the SDG Impact Fund.
Open archive ↗The investigation file also preserves an older Adbank YouTube link associated with the campaign archive.
Open video ↗The uploaded file preserves another Adbank-related YouTube link in the section discussing The Beard Club and investor promotion.
Open video ↗The separate securities document reviewed for this project lists three United States purchasers and approximately CAD $534,593.42 in distributions to them.
See filing analysis ↓48-page working investigation file containing source links, screenshots, archived marketing materials, team images, investor chat captures, Adbank/SDG references and the ICO video link. Because it mixes evidence with advocacy and allegations, it should be displayed as a research file rather than treated as an adjudicated record.
Open uploaded PDFPages 4–6: PIVX / Kelsey Cole material and Forbes link.
Pages 9–10: Adbank ICO, Austrian tourism / viral-video discussion, and the e6vrlODdRgQ ICO video.
Pages 11–12: investor/video material and Celsius/SDG references.
Page 15: Adbank-to-SDG theory and SDG asset-growth table.
Haystack identifies the clip as a 2:59 WSB Atlanta report. Because Haystack's player does not reliably permit third-party iframe embedding, this button opens the publisher's hosted video directly.
Watch on Haystack ↗Use this as the lead broadcast clip because it gives the story a human voice: regulator, donor, subject response and expert commentary in one segment.
The site is now structured to support native YouTube embeds. A relevant archived Adbank investigation source references YouTube video ID 1MBn960MAkA. Keep this slot only after verifying the video's title and publisher.
Archive and embed public interviews or presentations where Suber explains the fund's mission, asset model or donor-advised fund structure. The strongest documentary treatment lets viewers compare public statements with later records themselves.
Place a source/date label above each video and a short “Why this matters” note below it. Let the original video remain intact.
Major philanthropy reporting first raised questions about SDG Impact Fund's extraordinary asset growth. Donors later described unanswered grant requests. In July 2026, Georgia television put the regulator, a donor, and Suber's written response into the same broadcast story. Days later, philanthropy coverage followed the story into Wyoming.
Reading the coverage chronologically is more revealing than reading one article in isolation. The public narrative moves from “How did this little-known charity report $10 billion?” to “Where did donor money go?” and then to “What happened after Georgia barred the fund?”
Editorial note: Links below go to independent publishers or primary government sources. Their reporting and wording are their own.
The first major national examination of SDG Impact Fund's dramatic rise from roughly $238 million in reported assets in 2020 to $10 billion in 2021, including questions about noncash gifts, crypto, NFTs and low grantmaking relative to claimed assets.
A syndicated version of the national philanthropy investigation, helping move the story beyond specialist nonprofit audiences.
The story shifted from unusual tax filings to donors themselves. The Chronicle reported that multiple donors said communications and grant requests went unanswered and that money they expected to reach charities had not been distributed as intended.
Consumer Investigator Justin Gray interviewed Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and donor Bertram Meyer. WSB-TV also published Suber's written defense and confirmed an active Georgia Attorney General investigation involving Suber.
Local coverage brought the enforcement action home to Cartersville and summarized the alleged tuition, travel, credit-card and real-estate transactions described by the state.
The Chronicle followed the story after Georgia's action, reporting that a similarly named organization received tax-exempt status and was incorporated in Wyoming—raising questions about interstate charity oversight.
A sector-focused explainer uses the Georgia case to discuss how nonprofits can evaluate donor-advised fund sponsors and the risks when a sponsor fails.
The primary enforcement record. It contains the state's findings of fact, conclusions of law, cease-and-desist provisions, bars on charitable activity and the stated $100,000 joint-and-several civil penalty.
A useful independent portal for reviewing Form 990 information, compensation entries, organization details and the fund's historical public filings.
The sequence turns a complicated multi-year story into a clear narrative arc.
Case ENCH-250581. Findings, conclusions of law, sanctions and hearing notice.
Open record ↗Historical nonprofit filings showing reported assets, grants, officers and donor-advised fund information.
Open ProPublica ↗Canadian filing showing distributions by jurisdiction, including three U.S. purchasers and CAD $534,593.42.
View analysis ↓AP, Chronicle of Philanthropy, WSB-TV, WBHF and other coverage organized chronologically.
Open newsroom ↓Georgia's order traces name changes from Family Promise of Bartow County to Fifth Element Fund and then, in March 2019, to SDG Impact Fund, Inc.
Adbank launched an ICO. Forbes reported roughly $14 million raised within 30 days and profiled Kelsey Cole's role in the campaign.
Adbank publicity described an Austrian tourism pilot involving Red Bull Media House and separately promoted Adbank's sponsorship of the SDG Impact Fund around UN General Assembly week.
Tax filings reviewed in the broader investigation reported a dramatic increase in SDG Impact Fund assets, placing the organization in an unusually large financial category for a little-known charity.
Georgia says it began receiving donor complaints in March 2025. The order recounts an April 30 email stating that SDG Impact Fund would conclude operations, followed by additional bank activity.
The Secretary of State entered the emergency order in Case ENCH-250581, including the $100,000 civil penalty and bars on specified charitable activity.
People and organizations named in this project should have a visible path to provide documents, corrections or substantive responses. When practical, publish significant responses alongside the article they address rather than burying them.
Add a dedicated response archive as replies arrive, with dates and links to the reporting being challenged.
Correct factual errors prominently. Preserve an update note showing what changed and when. Do not silently rewrite material facts after publication.
Use three visible labels throughout the project: GOVERNMENT FINDING • PUBLIC RECORD • UNVERIFIED LEAD.
When Georgia says something, we write “Georgia found,” “the order states,” or “the Secretary alleged/concluded”—and link the exact page.
Securities filings, tax returns, corporate records and archived marketing are labeled by source and kept separate from the Georgia findings.
Connections we are still investigating are labeled as questions or leads. We do not turn overlap, association or chronology into a factual accusation without evidence.
The fund publicly described itself as a donor-advised fund supporting the U.N. Sustainable Development Goals and reported roughly $10 billion in assets in IRS filings.
Suber's written response to WSB-TV emphasized that the organization retained final decision-making authority over grants and investments.
Georgia's order recounts an April 30, 2025 communication telling select donor advisers that the fund would conclude operations during fiscal year 2025.
Independent philanthropy reporting questioned the relatively small amount of reported grants compared with the fund's claimed asset base.
Georgia's order describes commingling, loans, for-profit transfers and personal transactions that the Secretary concluded violated state charitable-solicitation law.
The order says transactions continued after donors were told the fund was concluding and says SDGIF appeared to operate as SDG Global.
Georgia's order states that between January 2022 and at least July 2025, approximately $171,618 was paid from the 86 Fund Account to a private college-preparatory school in Atlanta attended by two of Suber's children. Every “Receipt” module on this site should identify who made the finding and point readers to the underlying record.
See the source page ↑A documentary investigation into billions in reported charitable assets, the donors who started asking questions, the public image that surrounded the fund, and the government paper trail that followed.
Explore the evidence